Freeconomics

In 1961, a single transistor cost $10. Today, Intel’s latest chip has two billion transistors and sells for $300 (or 0.000015 cents per transistor – which is so cheap that basically a transistor is free.

Chris Anderson, the Wired Magazine Editor best known for The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business is Selling Less of More, has published his latest book,  Free: The Future of a Radical Price.  You can buy it or, more appropriately, you can read a free version on Scribd or download a free audio version from the iTunes Store.

There has been some early controversy with its publication – charges that he  plagiarized from Wikipedia. (“Is that even possible?” I hear some some young person asking.) And not all reviewers have loved it  ( Malcolm Gladwell in The New Yorker , for example), but I find the ideas really interesting.

On my “work-related” blog, I have been writing occasionally about what is sometimes called “open everything.” That idea comes from a newly emerging open source approach to many things besides software.

If you have a free mindset, you start to see free all around you – ads for a free weekend getaway, free parking, free samples, free downloads.

My sons were born in the mid-1980s, so they are pretty much the Net Generation that grew up on a free Web that offered lots of free content legally and led them to lots of illegal/free content.

But they are out of college and in the work world now, and I have been wondering for a few years what their generation will think of  “freeconomics” (not to be confused with freakonomics) when THEY are the business people using it to market or having it used against them to kill their business model.

There are good business models that use it.  The book includes classics like Gillette’s idea of giving away free razors and making the profit on selling the blades. That idea lives on with free (with a computer purchase) or very cheap printers that sell those expensive cartridges.

I wrote about this last year when The New York Times went to free online. Now they are surveying users to see if they would be willing to pay for the news. Not a good backstep, I would say.

Chris Anderson argues that while free was once a marketing gimmick it “has emerged as a full-fledged economy.”

If you look at all those Google free services (search, Gmail, maps, documents, web pages, Picasa for photos, the Chrome browser), you could wonder why they would give it all away – but then you know that Google is a very successful money-making company, so it must work.

This blog is a free service from WordPress and its weekday companion blog is a freebie from Google.

Then you have free services, like the photo site Flickr, that do offer a premium version for a cost, but can’t seem to make money at it. How do you make money by giving things away?

Think about what Wikipedia did to the encyclopedia/reference book market (and to students doing “research”). Craig’s List basically took down print newspapers by changing classified ads.

When Chris Anderson wrote the original article in Wired that led to his new book, he ended with this thought experiment:

“In 1954, at the dawn of nuclear power, Lewis Strauss, head of the Atomic Energy Commission, promised that we were entering an age when electricity would be “too cheap to meter.” Needless to say, that didn’t happen, mostly because the risks of nuclear energy hugely increased its costs. But what if he’d been right? What if electricity had in fact become virtually free?

Would we have made everything electric? Electric cars, all electric home heating? Well, why would we have continued with expensive fossil fuels? What would OPEC have done with their oil supply glut then?  99 cents a gallon gas? All electric changes global warming too.

Well, it didn’t happen with energy, but it might happen with digital technologies moving towards free.

Outside Reading

Mix Tapes

mixtape1A while back I came across this website that is edited by Jason Bittner called CassetteFromMyEx.com.  On the site people share their stories of lost (or everlasting) love that center around a mix tape they made for their love.

Jason Bittner is the co-creator of FOUND Magazine and an interesting photo book about LaPorte, Indiana. He also put together Cassette from My Ex: Stories and Soundtracks of Lost Loves which  is a collection of stories, essays, art, and other contributions by various artists, musicians, and writers.  It’s the story of the role of the mixtape that was especially big in the late 1970s and 80s when cassette tape reigned.

There’s also a book called Mix Tape: The Art of Cassette Culture by Thurston Moore . He is a founding member of the rock group Sonic Youth, as well as a poet. He also runs EcstaticPeace.com, a music, art, and literature website.

The compact audio cassette has been around since 1963. In the 1970s, these  inexpensive and portable tapes were part of the “downloadable” music culture long before the Internet and Napster.

Mix tapes let the DJ in us loose to create mixes for ourselves, friends, parties, road trips – and for those we loved.

Moore classifies those love tapes into categories like the Romantic Tape, the Break-up Tape, the Road Trip Tape, to the Indoctrination Tape (made to introduce someone to “your music.”

And it was often more than just the songs.  There was the artwork, packaging, “liner notes” and even the sequencing.

One extended story of mixtape romance is by rock critic Rob Sheffield. He wrote a memoir using 22 “mix tapes” to describe his life with his wife, Renee, from their meeting in 1989 to her untimely death in 1997. Each of the chapters in Love Is a Mix Tape: Life and Loss, One Song at a Time begins with song titles from their mixes.

I have been making mix tapes all through the tape period and into CDs (some people still call them mixtapes). Though I have made many for my own listening pleasure, so that in the car I am listening to my own radio station, about half have been for other people.

My friend Steve gets sets when he heads across country in his car.  Though I imagined when I made them that they were highway sets, late night radio sets, an hour of quieter music sets, he told me recently that he only liked the loud ones – “Because I have the car windows open so I can smoke.”

A group of friends and I came up with a list of all our favorite summer songs. From the obvious ones (Beach Boys’ tracks like “All Summer Long,”  “In the Summertime,” “Summer Breeze”)  to songs we associated with summer because they were summer hits or we just associated with summer (“Time of the Season,” “Rikki Don’t Lose That Number,” “Take It Easy”).  Then I did the sequencing after gathering them from our collected CDs and with a few iTunes downloads. I listened to all of them trying to pick out references to a month or part of summer and created June, July and August sets.  “See You In September,” “Wouldn’t It Be Nice” and “School’s Out” are part of the June set.  For July, “Up on the Roof,” “Summer in the City,” “4th of July, Asbury Park (Sandy),” Kodachrome,” Hot Fun in the Summertime.”  The August CD included “Summer, Highland Falls,” Boys of Summer,” “Groovin’” “Summertime Blues,” “You’ve Lost That Lovin’ Feeling,” Summer Wind.”

My friend Pat was a big fan of the summer set, so she (a teacher) also got back-to-school and end-of-school mixes. And I have done winter, spring, and winter into spring CDs.

My largest set of mixes are for my wife, Lynnette.  This month we hit anniversary thirty, so the mixes span decades. Most of the early cassettes have jammed their last time, so we have moved to CDs the past decade.

The first mixtapes were actually pre-marriage. Tapes I made for car rides to the beach or vacations.  Have you seen the movie As Good As It Gets? Jack Nicholson’s character makes careful mixes for a car trip in the hope of seducing the character played by Helen Hunt. If not seduce, at least made to reveal who he really is via the songs – something he can’t seem to do in person. Been there; mixed that.

I love making lists anyway, so making song lists is something I like doing – like the people in Nick Hornby’s novel High Fidelity and the great film version (and even the soundtrack CD).

Parenting As Spiritual Practice

I think that most parents sense that there is a spiritual aspect to parenting.  You sense your children’s sense of wonder and you want to support and nurture that wonder.

We are also living in a time when more people are disconnected from religious institutions. I don’t see spiritual and religious are interchangeable, but I do see them as connected.

A radio program that I listen to had a guest that made he point that the spiritual life begins not in abstractions, but in concrete everyday experiences.  I agree, though I’m not sure everyone would. The “theory into practice” approach is the one we have used in schools for a very long time, and it’s a hard habit to break.

My friend, Steve, is very involved in raising his granddaughter and it has set me thinking again about the monumental spiritual tasks involved in parenting. My sons are grown and I often think about what I tried to do with them when they were very young as spiritual “training.”

buddha childAs parents, our “little theologians and philosophers” often ask us really difficult questions about life and the universe – questions that we may not have answered for ourselves.

Whether the questions are overtly religious (Where does God live? Why can’t I see God?) or not overtly religious but spiritual (Why do people die? Why are people mean? Why am I sad?) never made the answers easier for me. That’s probably because my own religious upbringing never answered the big questions for me.

The “quest”  in questions has been a lifelong pursuit for me, and that’s probably true for many of you reading this. I will say that religion has been the starting place for answers, and sometimes it has been my fall back answer when nothing better could be found.

My approach was pretty consistently trying to include the spiritual in the everyday practices. (This may have come from some Buddhist studies.)  Teaching my sons to read, settling them into sleep, walking in the woods, looking at stars, cooking and eating, working in the garden, doing schoolwork – so many things offer opportunities to build the concepts that I hope would give them the knowledge to formulate their own ethics and philosophy.

I know my parents just tried to pass on what they had been taught – even when they didn’t find much comfort, answers or guidance in the practices.

If my generation and the current generation is even less connected to any specific religious traditions and institutions than their parents and grandparents, what mix of spiritual practices from our family and the culture do we have?

As someone who has been a teacher for more than thirty years, I can affirm that children may ultimately teach us far more than we teach them. You will never learn something more deeply than if you have taught it to others.

In that radio program, the guest, Sandy Sasso,  said “Children open windows for us or can crawl through windows that we can’t crawl through, and they open part of our life that maybe has been dormant for a long time.”

If I was not entirely successful in teaching my sons what I wanted to teach them about a spiritual life, I was certainly more successful in teaching myself by the practice things that I needed to know.

Dreams of Time Travel

I read Alan Lightman’s novel, Einstein’s Dreams, when it came out in 1993.  It’s a strange novel which imagines what Einstein may have been dreaming about in Bern, Switzerland before he published his Special Theory of Relativity in 1905.

I have had a fascination with Einstein ever since I was a teenager. I first came to him because he seemed connected to an earlier fascination with the possibility of time travel.

The 26 year old Albert Einstein is in an unhappy marriage. He has a job as a patent clerk that he dislikes and that is far below his abilities. In his head are dreamscapes of theoretical realms of time.

Alan Lightman describes the dreams which occur between April 14, 1905 and June 28, 1905.  Of course,  all of it is pure imagination.  There’s science in the imagined worlds where people’s lives are based on time being circular or flowing backwards, or slowing down.

The project Einstein was working on concerned electricity and magnetism, but the solution required a reconception of time.

When the book opens, Einstein has finished with his new theory of time and, while he waits a few hours for a typist in his patent office, he thinks his dreams.

Many of the dreams seem in their language like poems -

14 April 1905

Suppose
time is a circle,
the world repeats
endlessly
births, deaths, a glass falls and breaks,
all is repeated
and then again
nothing is temporary
or permanent.
Some people know
all this has happened before.
They walk the night streets
and cannot unbreak the glass,
prevent the death,
erase one unkind word.

16 April 1905

Time flows like a stream here
and when some rivulet
turns away and connects backstream,
it carries the people back.
Do you see them?
They are the fearful ones.
They know that any change they make
now,
in the past,
will change the future.

I wanted to build a time machine ever since I saw the movie version of H.G. Wells’ The Time Machine. I probably read the Classics Illustrated comics version of the novel before I read the novel. I had boxes of discarded electronics and machines in my basement that I had culled on garbage collection days. I loved playing with the gears, knobs and circuit boards. I learned some things along the way, got some nasty shocks and burned myself on my soldering iron, but I never did get a working time machine. Many years later, watching the movie E.T., I watched the alien build his communicator in that same ridiculously easy way.

I have read that Wells wrote his novel partially in response to Charles Darwin publishing his theory of evolution which was the big scientific news of the time. His novel can be seen as as a story about evolution, as he tells how we will evolve in the future. It’s not a pretty, but a cautionary, tale.

His Time Traveller goes forward to 802,701 AD in the same location as his London basement workshop. He finds a race of elfin, beautiful, vegetarian, but virtually helpless creatures. Their life is thoughtless idleness and they seem quite satisfied in their blissful ignorance. But there is also another offshoot of our species who lives beneath the surface – and they are quite evil.

Can we go back in time? Einstein was not much fun for time travel enthusiasts.  Though we might imagine going back in time and righting wrongs (small ones of our own or large historical ones), he pretty much concluded that if we were to travel back, we would be who we were and do what we had done again. It’s an infinite loop. It doesn’t make for a good story or film. (So much for Back to the Future.)

Simplified, Einstein said that by traveling at the speed of light, you would force time to slow down, then to stop, and finally to go backward. Of course, even if we could go faster than the speed of light, none of us could survive the speedy journey. (Though Superman did in a film in order to save Lois Lane.) Special relativity states that your mass would become infinite in the process. Some proponents of time travel point out that Einstein’s equations for general relativity do allow some forms of time travel, but then we are into science that is not for here.

If you do want to still pursue some time travel, check into the ten dimensional hyperspace theory, wormholes and dimensional windows.

Time travel is a risky business. Personally, I am not a fan of  blasting into some other time and finding myself binding into some substance in the space which I or the machine now occupies.

Einstein also warned of paradoxes. Meeting your parents before you are born is a popular one.  (See the first Back to the Future film)

4th May 1905

Time passes
but little happens.
Year to year,
month to month,
day to day,
the passage of events
are the same.
If you have no ambitions
you are unaware of your suffering,
the ambitious ones
know and suffer
but very slowly.

8th May 1905

The world will end
on the 26th of September 1907.
Everyone knows it.
Schools close the year before.
Businesses close the month before.
People are surprisingly unafraid.
They think over their coffee that
now there is nothing to really fear.
On September 25th
there is laughter on the streets,
neighbors who never spoke
greet each other as friends.
We are all equal in the world of one day.
One minute before the end
everyone in Berne gathers together.
No one moves or speaks.
It is like leaping off a mountain.
They hold hands as the end approaches.
They are weightless,
cool air rushes by,
the whiteness
of snow fills their vision.


Read
The Time Machine

Einstein’s Dreams

Watch
Back to the Future – The Complete Trilogy

The Time Machine

Mike Wallace Interviews

There is a great collection of old TV interviews now available online that were done by Mike Wallace in the late 1950s.  The Mike Wallace Interview ran from 1957 to 1960, but this collection held by the Ransom Center only has interviews from 1957 and 1958.

Wallace donated these materials to the Ransom Center. The 65 recordings are mostly kinescopes (films of the program made by filming a television monitor). Wallace also donated the related materials, including his prepared questions, research material, and correspondence.

I watched (at times, I just listened to them while I was working online) the ones with Steve Allen, Frank Lloyd Wright, Tony Perkins, Salvador Dali, Reinhold Niebuhr, Aldous Huxley, Erich Fromm, and Ayn Rand. They are amazingly intelligent conversations.

As an example, the interview with Aldous Huxley from May 1958 presents Huxley as social critic and author of Brave New World.  They talk about threats to freedom in the United States, overpopulation, bureaucracy, propaganda, drugs, advertising, and television.   You can watch the video and read the transcript.

The Meeting Point Between Aptitude and Passion

If you have heard of Sir Ken Robinson, it probably is because of his TED talks, especially “Do Schools Kill Creativity?” (see bottom)  That’s how I first encountered him.  He was a professor of arts education in England and is known as a speaker on the development of creativity, innovation and human resources.

He has a new book called The Element: How Finding Your Passion Changes Everything.

In the book’s Foreword, he tells this story:

A few years ago, I heard a wonderful story, which I’m very fond of telling. An elementary school teacher was giving a drawing class to a group of six-year-old children. At the back of the classroom sat a little girl who normally didn’t pay much attention in school. In the drawing class she did. For more than twenty minutes, the girl sat with her arms curled around her paper, totally absorbed in what she was doing. The teacher found this fascinating. Eventually, she asked the girl what she was drawing. Without looking up, the girl said, “I’m drawing a picture of God.” Surprised, the teacher said, “But nobody knows what God looks like.”

The girl said, “They will in a minute.”

His new book reminds me somewhat of Malcolm Gladwell’s book Outliers: The Story of Success which also contains interviews with successful people and tries to reach some conclusions about how they achieved success. Robinson interviews people who have been successful in the arts, sports, education, and business how they have found in their “Element.” Now, reading about people like Paul McCartney, The Alchemist author Paulo Coelho and Matt Groening, creator of The Simpsons might be interesting and might be inspiring, but the value of the book would have to be whether or not it leads YOU towards your element. These people were able to make a living (as in a salary) from a passion or were able to significantly enrich their lives through their passion. They are “in their element.”

Ah, yes – but how does one find that Element?

One way is to think about what you would do if you could erase the need to make money, and if you could erase any concern for what others thought of you. It’s not helpful if all you can say is “I would just hang out with my friends.” But if the answer is that you would just work in your greenhouse, get back to painting watercolors, volunteer at the animal shelter or write poetry, you might have a start.

Robinson describes the Element in his book as the “meeting point between natural aptitude and personal passion.”

He talks about the idea of “multiple intelligences”, an idea proposed by Howard Gardner in 1983.

Robinson feels there is a big difference between asking if people are intelligent – as we do with testing – and asking how they are intelligent – which we don’t do very often at all.

So, the Element is a place, a point where the activities you enjoy and are (perhaps, naturally) good at, meet.

Robinson emphasizes the importance of finding a circle of like-minded people with your passion and of mentors. As you would expect with his background, he also talks about reforming and transforming education.

Robinson doesn’t feel that your age and occupation are barriers. But, getting back to that original question to ask yourself, eliminating the need to make a living and being able to reject the opinions of others as you follow your passion is no easy task.

Still, the book might be what finally pushes you to see your passion and move towards that point.


TED Talks – Sir Ken Robinson on “Do schools kill creativity?” He makes an entertaining and good case for creating an education system that nurtures (rather than undermines) creativity.

http://www.sirkenrobinson.com

Waiting For Charlie Rose

This is not a new video, but if you haven’t seen it, it is a new video.

PBS talker Charlie Rose in conversation with Charlie Rose. Talking about Internet technology (perhaps).

In this editing exercise, Mr. Rose is in an absurd (Radiohead) world of dialogue (sometimes clear, sometimes hostile, sometimes not dialogue) one-on-one with someone very much like himself.

Why is “Steve” not happy. Yahoo, Microsoft, Google. (We’re not going to do that.)

Using a single episode of the “Charlie Rose” program as raw footage, Andrew Filippone Jr. created “‘Charlie Rose’ by Samuel Beckett.”

Steve is not happy. What did Charlie Rose think of it? Click and see or hear.

Vote for Ghosthorse in the Native American Music Awards

Ksa CD cover

Ksa CD cover

My lifelong friend, Dan Grigsby, has been doing music forever – from our basement bands and acoustic pairings, to his professional life of the past few decades as a producer and recording engineer.

He has been playing percussion with the Native American music band Ghosthorse. Ghosthorse is Tiokasin Ghosthorse, Charley Buckland and Dan.

The band and their album Ksa are nominated in ten categories in this year’s Native American Music Awards, and starting August 4th, the voting is open to the public.

Please give a listen to some of their music online, and if you like it, vote for the group in the Tenth Annual Native American Music Awards.
Here are the categories and the numbers of the Ghosthorse listings in each category:

E. Debut Artist of The Year – 11 Ghosthorse – KSA
F. Debut Group of The Year – 4 Ghosthorse – KSA
I. Flutist of The Year – Tiokasin Ghosthorse
M. Best Instrumental Recording – 6 KSA – Ghosthorse
S. Best Producer – Dan Grigsby
U. Record of The Year – 27 KSA – Ghosthorse
W. Song/Single of The Year – 47 Prayer – Ghosthorse
X.  Songwriter of The Year –  62 Tiokasin Ghosthorse, Charley Buckland, Dan Grigsby
Y. Best Spoken Word Recording – 6 KSA Ghosthorse
CC. Best World Music Recording – 9 KSA Ghosthorse

Ghosthorse music is available at: http://www.ghosthorse.biz/