Lost Weekend

lostwkmilland

Yeah, no posts this past weekend in Paradelle. A lost weekend.

Not a lost weekend like in the novel by Charles R. Jackson that was turned into the better known 1945 film, The Lost Weekend, directed by Billy Wilder and starring Ray Milland.

I didn’t spend the weekend in a drunken state. Maybe that would have been an improvement.

In the novel, the protagonist is on a five-day alcoholic binge. He’s also a would-be writer (he uses foreign phrases and Shakespeare quotes, so he must be). A famous scene (parodied in The Simpsons) is when he tries to pawn his typewriter for drinking money.

I was on a seven-day work binge. Just too much to do last week after a week’s vacation. Do you find that whatever recharge you do get from some time off drains much too quickly when you return to work? It must be my human battery, because the charge seems to be shorter every time.

I was a week without the Internet and did not feel any withdrawal symptoms. I had queued up 15 blog posts on different blogs that I do, so that things would appear “normal”  for the week. That worked. But writing anything last week was painful.

This week, this month, doesn’t seem too much better.

But here I am drinking my morning coffee and typing, trying to write a post before I head out to teach a class and then head to my office to work on a big report that’s due in a week, try to prepare two presentations for conferences this month and do my day-to-day work. Hopefully, I get to finish this post sometime today…

And that’s just work. What about home and family? Spent a chunk of the weekend helping my mom deal with all that being 92 means. (I dread getting old.)

And I ‘d rather be walking a beach, or even working in the yard clearing out the frost-zapped vegetable garden, raking and mulching leaves. But no time for any of that.

I wrote a post here called “Getting Lost” back in July and since then it has consistently been in the top 3 read posts on this blog. I don’t know if it’s the title, the book that inspired it or my tales of feeling lost literally and figuratively. Something connected with readers.

I wrote another post as a kind of answer to that post and I called it “Getting Found: The Tracker” which was ostensibly about the well-known tracker from New Jersey, Tom Brown. Still, that post was also about “finding yourself” – which you can do with a compass, but you can also do by wandering aimlessly in the woods.

Now, it’s an weekday evening in Paradelle and I shouldn’t be writing on this blog. Not because there’s any law against it (I do post full moon posts during the week already), but because I have so many other “more important” things to do.

More important. There’s the rub. Is my homework for my classes and bill paying more important than writing? Yeah, I guess so. If I don’t do those things, bad things will result and my life will worsen. If I don’t write on my blogs… nothing good OR bad happens. My butterfly flutters it wings.

If only I didn’t so much enjoy writing online. So much so, that I would sell my laptop in order to be able to write on it.

lostwkfilm

Timewave 2012

Last weekend, I wrote about Terence McKenna who I was reading because of some 2012 references he had made in his books and talks. Most of that was not connected to the more well known (at least recently) Maya Long Count calendar, but to his “novelty theory.”

McKenna felt he had found a way to predictsthe ebb and flow of novelty in the universe as an inherent quality of time. As I said last week, McKenna developed the theory in the mid-1970s after through studying the King Wen sequence of the I-Ching (The Book of Changes).

For McKenna, “novelty” is newness and dynamic change , and its opposite is static habituation.

http://www.ascension2012.com

http://www.ascension2012.com

He claimed to have graphed novelty over time and found a fractal waveform known as timewave zero or simply the timewave results. The graph shows at what times (not locations) novelty is increasing or decreasing.

It all had a kind of historian + Nostradamus feel to it for many people who heard it explained.  McKenna said the timewave graph showed great periods of novelty in our past. Examples: 4 billion years ago (when Earth was formed), 65 million years ago (dinosaur extinction and mammals take dominance), about 10,000 years ago (end of Ice Age) the late 18th century (social and scientific revolutions), and during the the 1960s.

Yes, there was novelty then, but anyone with a world history textbook could have plotted that on a graph and written a paper.

But, he also plotted some future periods of novelty that would occur after his death in 2000. One was near the time of September 11, 2001 (attack on New York City) and November 2008 (election of Barack Obama), October 2010  and a period of novelty progressing towards the infinity on 21 December 2012.

December 21, 2012 was a date that McKenna claims to have arrived at without knowledge of the interpretation of the the Maya Calendar’s end date. That, to me, is an incredible piece of synchronicity. McKenna said that he was the first person to suggest in print, in 1975, that in our time, the winter solstice was moving closer and closer to the point on the ecliptic where it will eclipse the galactic center.

Terence worked with a colleague, Peter Meyer, who created a computer program called “Timewave Zero” that took the theories and discoveries concerning the I Ching and created time maps based upon them.

Those novelty maps do not determine what will happen in the future,  just what the levels of novelty will be.

Terence McKenna

Terence McKenna

The Maya were interested in the future,  this time we live in.

I view that 2012 date in the same way as McKenna writing in 1999 – that the world was perhaps not meant to end, but was to be born, on December 21, 2012.

Jenkins’ conclusion:

“…the ancient Maya understood something about the nature of the cosmos and the spiritual evolution of humanity that has gone unrecognized in our own worldview. This understanding involves our alignment with the center of our Galaxy, our cosmic center and source, and identifies A.D. 2012 as a time of tremendous transformation and opportunity for spiritual growth, a transition from one World Age to another.”

The media will be telling you with increasing intensity over the next 38 months that:  a) the world will end  b) the nuts are at it again  c) the world is changing   d) nothing will happen.

I don’t expect SomeThing to happen that day, but I do expect SomeThing to begin near that date. Maybe we won’t see the results of it until 2033 – the 2000th anniversary of Jesus’ death.

Terence McKenna in December 2012

I was reading some more this past week about the 2012 theories and came back to some writings by Terence McKenna.

mckenna_terenceTerence McKenna has a kind of spaced-out hippie reputation, but he was a very interesting thinker.  This writer, public speaker, philosopher, psychonaut and ethnobotanist was known for ability to entertain and to articulate his knowledge to non-academics.

Some of that is colored in the mainstream press by his use of psychedelics, and his interest in topics like metaphysics, plant-based entheogens, shamanism and the theoretical origins of human consciousness.

What I was rereading was mostly about his concept of novelty theory.

Some background:  In 1971, Terence, his brother Dennis, and three friends traveled to the Colombian Amazon in search of oo-koo-hé, a plant preparation containing DMT. They didn’t find it, but they did find forms of ayahuasca and psilocybe cubensis.

During some psychedelic experiments, Terence said that he was in contact with Logos, a divine voice he believed was universal to visionary religious experience. Some revelations from Logos led him to explore further using an early form of the I Ching. From those experiences, he came to his “Novelty Theory.”

(Many of these ideas are in a 1975 book by Terence and Dennis in their 1975 book The Invisible Landscape: Mind, Hallucinogens, and the I Ching)

He was a very prolific speaker and writer throughout the 1980s. His book, The Archaic Revival, has pieces about  psychedelic mushrooms, the Amazon, virtual reality, UFOs, evolution, the Rebirth of the Goddess, and the End of History.

In the early 1990s, he was connected to the psychedelic rave/dance scene and his speeches are sampled by many bands and freely available online. (The Psychedelic Salon is a good starting place.)

McKenna says:

“Science fiction is the gateway drug.”

“I’m not interested in cataloging the varieties of the doorways to the secret. I’m interested in finding one doorway that works.”

Despite all the hallucinogenics and messianic talk, McKenna was actually not a supporter of many “New Age” and pop psychology movements that you would “expect” he would embrace.

Talking about alien abductions, he said:

“Pro bono proctologists from other star systems are not making unannounced, free house calls in our homes. This could almost be a litmus test for sanity.”

What I was re-searching in his books was an interesting connection he made to 2012. In Maya Cosmogenesis 2012: The True Meaning of the Maya Calendar End-Date by John Major Jenkins (with Terence McKenna) they explore the alternative world view offered by Maya culture.

Cosmogenesis is the origin and development of the cosmos. The term “Cosmogenesis” was used by Helena P. Blavatsky to describe the content of Volume I of her two-volume The Secret Doctrine, published in 1888. Cosmogenesis was also the term used by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin to describe the cosmological process of the creation of the Universe. (It’s also addressed in the Tao Te Ching [Daode Jing] as well.)

Jenkins explains how the Maya revered the end-time as a zero point. He interprets the point not as the end of the world but as an energy field-effect reversal and rebirth into a new World Age.

The Long Count calendar end-date, scheduled to occur on December 21, 2012, corresponds with a rare alignment of our solar system. Jenkins contends that the Maya were aware of this celestial event and believed that it portended a dramatic rebirth for humanity. The Galactic center at the central bulge of the Milky Way was seen as the pregnant point in the heavens that gave birth to the world.

That point is seen by scientists to be a black hole and an  alignment of the sun at that very point, in the Mayan calculations, culminates at the winter solstice, December 21, 2012.

Now, these seasonal alignments occur once every 6,450 years, but the December 2012 solstice occurs once every 25,800 years.

Lots of coincidences – if that’s what they are…

“Magic, which we haven’t heard much about seriously, since the sixteenth century, magic is the idea that the world is made of language, and that you can control the world through language, through spells, through the power of letters, so forth and so on. Computer code is magical language. It’s language which when executed causes something to actually happen.”

Terence had a highly aggressive form of brain cancer and underwent various treatments, including experimental gamma knife radiation treatment. He died on April 3, 2000, at the age of 53.

A McKenna podcast from NPR 1999

McKenna’s books

You Have Mail, But For How Long?

“Neither snow, nor rain, nor heat, nor gloom of night stays these courageous couriers from the swift completion of their appointed rounds.”

It’s not the U.S. Postal Service’s motto. It goes back 2500 years ago to the Greek historian, Herodotus. He was actually talking about Persian mounted postal couriers during the war between the Greeks and Persians about 500 B.C.

According to the U.S.P.S. site, they don’t have a slogan. When the New York City General Post Office was built, the architects engraved the adage all around the outside of the building.

But email, Twitter, Facebook and all the rest is really hurting the USPS. Mail volume is down about 22.7 billion pieces and over 700 branches are closing. They have almost a $7 billion net loss.

The USPS is considering ending Saturday deliveries.

Andy Rooney said recently on Sixty Minutes that getting any mail (even junk) is better than email. I wouldn’t go that far, but a paper letter or card from someone is better than the electronic version.

Which God?

universe

I came across a 2006 Baylor University survey that polled Americans about their beliefs in God, including God’s characteristics and behavior.

The idea was to analyze the results and determine how engaged in the world Americans believed God to be and whether or not they thought God was angry at humanity’s sins.

Their conclusions were that Americans tended to believe in one of four types of God.

The Authoritarian God is very involved in people’s “daily lives and world affairs.” They believe that God will punish those who are unfaithful. This God would be responsible for our current economic depressions and any natural disasters.

Next, is the Benevolent God who is involved in our daily lives, but is not angry or wrathful and is mostly a positive force.

Those who believe in a Critical God say that God observes the world and is unhappy with it, but does not get involved in our daily affairs. Divine justice may not be of this world.

Finally, they identified a Distant God who is not involved in the world and is not angry but is, rather, a “cosmic force which sets the law of nature in motion.”

It’s Turtles All the Way Down

Turtle Island

Turtle Island

I think I first saw the expression “Turtles all the way down,” when I read Carl Sagan’s Broca’s Brain: Reflections on the Romance of Science. He recounted it as a conversation between a Western traveler and an Oriental philosopher.

I don’t have that book handy, but it is also told in Stephen Hawking’s A Brief History of Time which is on a nearby shelf (actually, I have both the illustrated edition, and the “in a nutshell” versions which I found easier to understand).

A well-known scientist (some say it was Bertrand Russell) once gave a public lecture on astronomy. He described how the earth orbits around the sun and how the sun, in turn, orbits around the center of a vast collection of stars called our galaxy. At the end of the lecture, a little old lady at the back of the room got up and said: “What you have told us is rubbish. The world is really a flat plate supported on the back of a giant tortoise.” The scientist gave a superior smile before replying, “What is the tortoise standing on?” “You’re very clever, young man, very clever”, said the old lady. “But it’s turtles all the way down!”

If you search a bit online, you’ll also find it called “The Infinite Turtle Theory” and find that it has found its way into a good number of cultural works. I myself have pinned the saying to several web pages I have online.

Although Hawking relates the anecdote more to point out something about ridiculous theories that can’t be proven, others actually use it as a way to discuss an infinite regression belief about the origin and nature of the universe.

When I encountered it, I immediately thought of it as a variation on ancient beliefs that the world is borne through the universe on the back of an animal. In many Native American creation myths, it is a turtle that holds up the world called “Turtle Island.”

I also found that it might possibly be similar to some Indian classical texts, including the myth that the tortoise Chukwa supports the elephant Maha-pudma who holds up the world.

The reference to Bertrand Russell may be from a 1927 lecture he gave titled “Why I Am Not a Christian” during which he said:

“If everything must have a cause, then God must have a cause. If there can be anything without a cause, it may just as well be the world as God, so that there cannot be any validity in that argument. It is exactly of the same nature as the Hindu’s view, that the world rested upon an elephant and the elephant rested upon a tortoise; and when they said, “How about the tortoise?” the Indian said, “Suppose we change the subject.”

But you could go back to John Locke in 1690 (“An Essay Concerning Human Understanding“) where he refers to an Indian who said the world was on an elephant which was on a tortoise “but being again pressed to know what gave support to the broad-backed tortoise, replied — something, he knew not what.”

A more modern allusion to it supposedly came from William James (father of American psychology) who supposedly had a conversation with an old lady who told him the Earth rested on the back of a huge turtle.
“But, my dear lady”, James asked, “what holds up the turtle?”
“Ah”, she said, “that’s easy. He is standing on the back of another turtle.”
“But would you be so good as to tell me what holds up the second turtle?”
“It’s no use, Professor”, said the lady, avoiding a logical trap. “It’s turtles, turtles, turtles, all the way!”

Ah yes,  we will never get to the bottom of some things.

Infinite regressions. What existed before the universe existed?  If God created the universe, what created God?

It’s turtles all the way down.

Hindu

Chukwa supporting the elephant Maha-pudma

Philosophy 100

Usually, the beginning course in college is coded as “101.” You take psychology 101 and English 101 and philosophy 101. Sometimes, courses considered below college level (remedial or basic skills, for example) are coded as 099 or 001, 004 etc.

I think many of us, whether we have ever attended college or not, have studied some Philosophy 100. It may not be college, but it’s hardly remedial. It is the philosophy we learn and develop each day in living.

Of course, you can get some college philosophy these days without attending an institution of “higher” learning or paying any tuition. I was reminded of that once again while watch that font of knowledge, the NBC Today show.

They had a distinguished Harvard philosophy professor earlier this month and gave him (as commercial TV commonly does) about 4 minutes to convince us that philosophy is still worth studying today.

That professor, Michael Sandel, is a popular Harvard professor. They estimate that 15,000 students have taken his courses over 30 years.  I suppose he was promoting his book “Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do?” but I thought he did a nice job considering the short time allowed. (He actually gets cut off mid-sentence to go to commercial!)

There is a 30 minute video of him in action on the Harvard site in a lecture on Justice: A Journey into Moral Reasoning.

There is also a 45 minute BBC video of Sandel talking about the prospects of a new politics of the common good. He asks and attempts to answer questions like:  Should immigrants pay for citizenship? Should we pay schoolchildren for good test results, or even to read a book?  And he calls for a more robust public debate about such questions, as part of a “new citizenship.”

My Perpetual Motion Machine

radiometerwindow

I’ll bet you recognize the light-bulb looking object shown here on my windowsill, but I suspect you don’t know much about it.

The first one I remember seeing was not in a science class, but in the window of an doctor’s office that I passed many times as a kid. I was fascinated by the fact that it turned without any power source. Was it a perpetual motion device? No, because it required sunlight to move. Was it my introduction to solar power? Sort of, but not accurately.

I wanted one and I finally ordered from a science supply catalog. It has been spinning near all of my desks for about 40 years.

I had heard the term “perpetual motion” and was intrigued by the notion of movement that goes on forever. The idea of something that perpetually (indefinitely) produces more energy than it consumes fascinated me.

Somewhere along the way, I was exposed to the law of conservation of energy which states that energy cannot be created or destroyed and also, disappointingly, implies that such a perpetual motion machine cannot exist.

When I was about ten years old and deeply absorbed by my basement chemistry sets and “lab,” the idea of creating a “perpetual motion machine” took hold of me for a time. The idea of making something that broke a law of nature seemed like the biggest thing you could do. It was like being a Newton or an  Einstein. (I similarly remember that when my fifth grade teacher told us that every word in English had a vowel in it, I wanted very mucgh to find one that did not have a vowel.)

My quest for that machine that does not violate conservation of energy, but (like my radiometer) produces work by spontaneously extracting heat from its surroundings, thereby cooling them down, and converting the heat energy into mechanical work, never succeeded. It I had succeeded, you defininitely woould have heard about it.

It turns out that such machines are forbidden by the second law of thermodynamics.

My radiometer (AKA light-mill) was invented by the English physicist Sir William Crookes. It consists of a set of vanes reflective on one side and blackened on the other and mounted on a sensitively balanced spindle in a partially evacuated vessel. When exposed to light, the vanes rotate.

Why? As the blackened vanes become warmer and repel air molecules from the surface,  the slight difference in air pressure created causes the vanes to rotate.

The speed of rotation is affected by the pressure within the vessel. Higher pressure will increase drag and will be the dominant force affecting the vanes while at low pressure the molecular recoil will dominate. If the pressure is reduced too far there will be too few recoiling molecules to drive the vanes.

The type that bears Crookes name (mine is one of those) is an early-model radiant energy-detector. A variant type is the Nichols radiometer that operates on a different principle, and is more sensitive than the Crookes type.  As an eponym, radiometer usually means a Crookes radiometer.

I recommend that you go ahead and buy a radiometer and be inspired by its seemingly perpetual motion. It’s also another great science “toy” for parents to introduce their kids to science.

MORE
The Properties of the Force Exerted in a Radiometer

Crookes_radiometer

Remembering Dog Days

I don’t own a dog right now. I always had one when I was a kid. But my wife was raised in a pet-free zone and developed a fear of most dogs, so we never had one, though my sons always asked about getting one.  She actually had a good relationship with the dog I had when we were dating. Romper was a cutie and very smart (okay, so everyone says that) and at first used to squeeze between us on the couch because she was jealous.

As much as I love them, I know that dogs and other pets really tie you down, so I was not heartbroken about being dog-less. I figure somewhere in my retirement years I will want a dog again.

What got me thinking about dogs was listening to a podcast from the How Stuff Works guys about whether or not dogs perceive time. (You can download them all free in iTunes.)

It’s actually not that clear about whether or not dogs have a sense of time. From what I heard and then read, it seems divided between the scientists (No) and dog owners (Yes). Of course, we might have to adjust our thinking about time from our human perceptions a bit.

Time is a human construction to allow us to order our lives and all our time-keeping devices have changed how modern man perceives time. Animals don’t seem to care that much about it.

Albert Einstein once explained the principle of relativity by saying, “When a man sits with a pretty girl for an hour, it seems like a minute. But let him sit on a hot stove for a minute — and it’s longer than any hour. That’s relativity.”  He’s right that we all perceive time a bit differently and as individuals view the human construct of Time differently in different situations.

Because we remember events in a particular order, that structures our perception of time. Even the non-psychic amongst us can predict the future – the sun will rise in the morning, a TV program will be on at 8 PM, in 48 hours I will be back at work. That means that we have a sense of continuity, personal history and self-awareness.

dogclockDo dogs and other animals have any of these same abilities?

Does it remember what it ate yesterday? Does it know when it will be time to eat again?

One of the researchers on animal cognition referenced in the podcast is William Roberts. He says that animals are “stuck in time” – meaning that without being able to form memories, animals only live in the present. In other words, they can’t go back to memories and can’t predict forward.

Those are theories that almost any dog owner wil refute.

Owners would point to things like any training they have given their dog. as proof of a memory bank.  Roberts would say No and point to the way young children are trained to do things.

By age four, kids have learned to crawl, walk etc. but can’t recall where or how they learned them.

So, then you have to get into types of memory.  The four year old doesn’t have episodic memory (the ability to remember particular events in the past).

Just because my Romper knew what “stay” meant, it doesn’t mean she had a memory of when she learned that command.

They also point to some research with pigeons. (Right away, I have a problem with the leap from pigeon to dog, but…) Pigeons have an “internal clock” that allows them to learn when and where food would be available and dogs might use circadian oscillators to do the same. Those are those daily fluctuations of hormones, body temperature and neural activity that we also have. The pooch might use those to “predict” when it’s time to be fed or when the kids are coming home from school.

So, they don’t really “remember” the “time” of those events, but it’s a biological state at a particular time of day that they are reacting to as a stimulus.

The researchers have tried to test animals’ “working memories” (those are the short-term memories) and their “reference memories” (long-term) to see how well the animals recall sequences of events. They found that pigeons and primates (where are the doggies?) did fairly well at these tasks, but their memory faded fast. They concluded that that they were probably learning going from weakest memory to strongest memory, rather than actually “learning” or “remembering” a sequence.

Other researchers found that pigeons and monkeys performed well at reference memory tests in which they needed to remember a sequence after a delay between learning and testing [sources: Straub, D'Amato]. But, it took extensive training for the animals to learn these sequences, suggesting to Roberts that the ability did not come naturally to them. From these tests, it seems that animals would perceive time differently from humans, who have a relatively reliable and sophisticated memory of sequence of events.

While we might pack things for a trip, including dog food and bowls,  your dog will not be concerned.

Let me pause here to say that I find this Zen-like “living in the moment” world of dogs rather appealing.

How about Mr. Squirrel caching away food for winter? Isn’t that his 401K plan?  The researchers say they do it simply do it out of instinct. When your dog buries that bone or toy, is she saving it for the future or just having fun digging holes?

Feel free to post your dog tales as comments below – I’m sure all you dog (and cat and parrot and…) owners have evidence to contradict the research.

I won’t even get into the theory that goldfish have only an 8second memory storage.

The Dancer Gene

dancers

Research published in the September 2005 issue of Public Library of Science Genetics suggested that genetics may in part explain why some people are more interested in dance than others.

Okay, maybe you’re not very concerned about dance. I’m no dancer. can’t do it. But I have been known to do some dancer photos and paintings in my life, and I certainly appreciate that they have – something that I don’t have in me.

What interests me about the story is that there actually might be a gene for dance – and therefore, a gene for poetry, painting etc.

So, the researchers studied performing dancers, dance students, competitive athletes, and some people who were not dancers or athletes. The dancers were more likely to have variants of one gene that in animal studiesseems to influence social communication and bonding. They also are more likely to have a gene that regulates the level of the neurotransmitter serotonin, which has been linked to the experience of spirituality.

Are  dancers more spiritual and with a greater need for social contact? I would agree with that. But it’s also true of people in religious service. Do those genes make them want to dance or make them better dancers? That I don’t see.

What do you think? Are these things in our genes?

« Older entries