Estimates say that the universe is 13.8 billion years old, but there is a star that was dated at more than 14 billion years old. That can’t be possible, right? Can anything be older than the universe?
I saw a mention of this and so did some digging and found a longer article in All About Space magazine about this paradox.
The oldest star with a well-determined age in our galaxy is popularly called the Methuselah star and it is officially named HD 140283. It is 190.1 light-years away. Astronomers had set its age at about 14.5 billion years, which would make it older than the universe.
Methuselah was the nickname given by the press to the star in reference to the Biblical patriarch who was the longest-lived of all the figures in the Bible and was said to have died at age 969.
A post on the NASA website goes a bit deeper. Astronomers have been observing this star for more than 100 years. It is located in the constellation Libra.
In 2000, using the Hipparcos satellite, the star was estimated to be 16 billion years old. That bothered scientists who were using 13.8 billion as the age of the universe.
Non-believers in science probably would say that no one can know the age of the universe. Some religious people would say it always existed and that God existed before the universe. Scientists determined from observations of the cosmic microwave background that 13.8 billion years was the age of the universe.
This very old star is a metal-poor subgiant which means it is predominantly hydrogen and helium and contains very little iron. That composition means the star must have come into being before iron became commonplace – before or close to the Big Bang.
So how is this paradox explained? Is the cosmology wrong about the age of the universe? Is stellar physics wrong? Is the star’s distance wrong?
A new age calculation came via data from the Hubble telescope. It involves the rate of expansion of space, an analysis of the microwave background from the big bang, and measurements of radioactive decay. The short answer is that now they have marked the star’s age as overlapping the universe’s age
Scientists who deal with these very large numbers have a fudge factor and for the age of the universe, it seems to be an uncertainty factor of 800 million years, though a follow-up study updated the star’s age to 14.27 billion years.
Why does it matter when the universe began? Will it change my daily life? I don’t think knowing will change your life dramatically but it is one of those questions we have wanted to answer for a very long time.
The universe is expanding. Edwin Hubble showed that almost a hundred years ago. Everyone has heard of the Big Bang – though for some people it’s only about a TV series. But if you at least paid attention to the show’s theme song you’d know that:
Our whole universe was in a hot, dense state
Then nearly fourteen billion years ago expansion started, wait…
Math, science, history, unraveling the mysteries
That all started with the big bang! Hey!
There certainly was once a state of hot denseness that exploded out and that stretched space. That means there was a starting point and we should be able to measure when that point occurred. The universe is still expanding from that very big bang.
The latest theories I found suggest that the discrepancies in the timeline may be due to dark energy, or causal set theory or gravitational waves or ripples in the fabric of space and time created by pairs of dead stars.
Do I understand any of that? No, but apparently trying to answer the big questions leads scientists to lots of other useful information, in the way that going to the Moon or Mars leads to all kinds of inventions and discoveries.
I think searching for the answer might be more important than finding the answer.