You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘string theory’ tag.


How did it all begin? The Big Bang Theory is well known enough to be a TV sitcom, but we don’t even know if that is the answer.

String theory gets some attention (even on that TV show). If staring up at the near part of the universe on a clear night makes you think we are just a grain of sand on a gigantic beach, then string theory should make you feel even smaller. It posits that our universe is just a tiny part of a much larger multi-universe that nine-dimensional. We see three of those dimensions.

Our little universe would appear flat in string theory. Like a sheet of paper, our universe can have other universes below or above us. And those other universes might have different rules of time, space, and size. If we travel far enough into these universes, we could meet parallel versions of ourselves.

Far more controversial is bubble theory of a universe in a vacuum of energy. Bubble theory came out of what we know about the rate by which the universe is expanding. Imagine a pot of water heating on a stove: the energy is the bubbles. Some bubbles pop, some bump into one another, some grow bigger, some get smaller. Each one is a universe.

No, I can’t imagine that.

I am feeling more comfortable these days with a holographic universe. You often hear this explained with a reference to the Matrix films. That makes it seem like a horrible universe.

Astrophysicists looking into anomalies in the cosmic background noise left after the Big Bang think there is evidence to support a holographic universe. You think you know that you exist in three dimensions. What about if we actually live in two dimensions?

How can we be in a 2D state in a 3D universe? That hologram on your credit card is a 3D image on a 2D surface. You can watch a 3D film on a 2D movie screen or on a 2D TV. You watch that 2D flat image but your brain sees 3D. Maybe everything you are looking at is 2D but our brain processes it as having three dimensions.

But our universe is not a movie. We can touch and smell objects.

“Reality as a simulation or hologram is no longer a fringe theory – with Nobel Prize winners and other thought leaders believing in it. All scientific discoveries start out as theories; some ultimately proven, some not. There is still the question of whether our universe actually exists? We may be simply living in something’s virtual reality simulation; very hard to prove one way or the other but we are getting closer.”       source

tv noiseUsing more recent advances in sensing equipment, scientists have detected a vast amount of data hidden in the white noise left over from the moment the universe was created. What is its “purpose”?  What is it “doing”?  (That white noise data even accounts for some of the random black and white dots you see on a TV that is not tuned into a station.)

And there are some people who take the physics of this theory of reality and use it to explain the paranormal abilities of the mind and other riddles of the brain and body.

  1. Scientific American editor Michael Moyer explains why some think our universe a hologram. Prepare. Black holes ahead.
  2. Brian Greene explains why space is not nothing. Space is a dynamic fabric.
  3. And then, from the world of fiction, Philip K. Dick explains why he now sees scientific evidence for the artificial worlds he created in his novels and stories – and when he had a glimpse of another holographic world. But who changed the programming code?


“Imagination is more important than knowledge.” ― Albert Einstein

Knowledge versus imagination. Einstein spent the latter part of his life pursuing a “single, all encompassing theory of the universe.”  He wanted to able to describe all of nature’s forces – to explain it all. He didn’t find it.

James Taylor sings in “Secret of Life

Now the thing about time
Is that time isn’t really real.
It’s just your point of view,
How does it feel for you?
Einstein said he
Could never understand it all.
Planets spinning through space,
The smile upon your face,
Welcome to the human race.

That Einstein quote at the top of this article continues “…for knowledge is limited to all we now know and understand, while imagination embraces the entire world, and all there ever will be to know and understand.” Imagination is often the pathway to increasing knowledge.

It is interesting that astronomy experiments now might test an idea of Einstein’s that he proposed almost exactly a century ago. It has been a longstanding question of why the Universe is expanding at an accelerated rate. Calculations in a new study could help to explain whether dark energy, as required by Einstein’s theory of general relativity, or a revised theory of gravity are responsible.

Einstein wasn’t a big fan of a lot of the physics that came at the end of his life, and would probably not be a fan of string theory.

Brian Greene is a professor of mathematics and physics at Columbia University who is probably best-known to the public for his NOVA television specials. He is one of the best “explainers” of this deep science. He explains string theory and I can understand it – until he stops explaining it and I have to tell someone else what he meant. The idea of minuscule filaments of energy vibrating in eleven dimensions that make up the “fabric of space.. and create every particle and force in the universe” is not easy to understand or accept.

String theory fills in the gaps of Newtonian physics, especially regarding how gravity works, and Einstein’s Unification Theory depends on the existence of extra dimensions, which contain these filaments and some string theorists posit that there are at least eleven dimensions. For all of us used to living in four dimensions, that is tough to imagine.

James Gates is known for work on supersymmetry, supergravity, and superstring theory. When he was asked about Einstein’s statement that “imagination is more important than knowledge,” he said“For a long time in my life, imagination was the world of play. It was reading about astronauts, and monsters, and traveling in galaxies, all of that kind of stuff, invaders from outer space on earth. That was all in the world of the imagination. On the other hand, reality is all about us. And it’s constraining, and it can be painful. But the knowledge we gain is critical for our species to survive.”


Brain Greene on string theory


Sure, you are comfortable in your little 3D world. But what if we are all 3D projections of a 2D universe? That’s what the holographic principle suggests.

Our 4D Universe (height, length, depth, and don’t forget about time) make up spacetime. That’s where all our theories about matter and the cosmos reside. But there are other theories – like string theory.

String theory proposes a lot more than those 4 dimensions. In Brian Greene’s The Hidden Reality: Parallel Universes and the Deep Laws of the Cosmos, he suggests a holographic multiverse of 11 dimensions.

Imagine a multiverse in which you have an infinite number of doppelgängers. Each of you is reading this blog post in a distant universe. The multiverse has may bubble universes, and the one you think you are living in is but one. Some of those universes move differently through time. One might be very close to this one, but remains invisible to us. The multiverse could be made purely of math.

The holographic principle might tell us that one of the ordinary three dimensions of space is unnecessary to understand this universe. Maybe, like a hologram, the information we call “depth” might be encoded in the other dimensions.

On the Nature website there is an article headlined “Simulations back up theory that Universe is a hologram.”

Headlines aside, the universe is not a hologram, at least not in the way most people think of holograms – perhaps as some character in Star Wars. The is “holographic universe” comes from string theory and currently isn’t any experimental evidence to support string theory. And some people claim they have evidence against string theory being valid. Right or wrong, it is of interest and it is interesting.

As far as I could find, the holographic principle starts in 1993 with Gerard t’Hooft. Even in simple language, it is complicated. He proposed that the information contained within a region of space can be determined by the information at the surface that contains it, and mathematically the space can be represented as a hologram of the surface that contains it. Get it?  Me neither.

In another article that argues that the universe is not a hologram, the author uses this example:

… suppose there is a road 10 miles long, and its is “contained” by a start line and a finish line. Suppose the speed limit on this road is 60 mph, and I want to determine if a car has been speeding. One way I could do this is to watch a car the whole length of the road, measuring its speed the whole time. But another way is to simply measure when a car crosses the start line and finish line. At a speed of 60 mph, a car travels a mile a minute, so if the time between start and finish is less than 10 minutes, I know the car was speeding.

If I ever gave any serious thought to the dimensions of our world in my younger years, I suspect it was when a teacher showed our class a short film based on the book Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions.

It is an 1884 satirical novella by the English schoolmaster Edwin Abbott who published it under the pseudonym “A Square.” Abbott intended the book to comment on the hierarchy of Victorian culture, in the same way that Swift’s Gulliver’s travels was meant as satire. But the book has held on more as an examination of dimensions.

Here’s Abbott’s original dedication:

To The Inhabitants of SPACE IN GENERAL And H. C. IN PARTICULAR This Work is Dedicated By a Humble Native of Flatland In the Hope that Even as he was Initiated into the Mysteries Of THREE Dimensions Having been previously conversant With ONLY TWO So the Citizens of that Celestial Region May aspire yet higher and higher To the Secrets of FOUR FIVE OR EVEN SIX Dimensions Thereby contributing To the Enlargement of THE IMAGINATION And the possible Development Of that most rare and excellent Gift of MODESTY Among the Superior Races Of SOLID HUMANITY

There are lots of print versions of Flatland and you can read it online.

The film I saw as a kid was a short, but there are a few versions including a feature film Flatland: The Movie.

In Flatland, a two-dimensional world occupied by geometric figures, women are simple line-segments and men are polygons with various numbers of sides. The narrator is a square, a member of the caste of gentlemen and professionals, who guides the readers through life in two dimensions.

The Square dreams about visiting a one-dimensional world called Lineland that is inhabited by points. While there, he tries their leader that there is a second dimension. He can’t do it because the inhabitants cannot imagine another dimension beyond their own.

When Square is visited by a three-dimensional sphere, he cannot comprehend it.

Finally, he sees Spaceland which has three dimensions. Square’s mind is opened to the idea of new dimensions. He tries to convince the Sphere a fourth or even fifth, sixth or more dimensions might exist but that is not an idea that the Sphere can accept.

When Square returned to Flatland, he can’t convince anyone that Spaceland exists. His existence prompts official decrees that anyone preaching the existence of three dimensions will be imprisoned and eventually that’s what happens to Square.

Square would be pleased to see this video with Michio Kaku called “The Multiverse Has 11 Dimensions.”

Visitors to Paradelle

  • 395,934

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,304 other followers

Follow Weekends in Paradelle on


I Recently Tweeted…

Tweets from Poets Online

Recent Photos on Flickr

%d bloggers like this: